Issue No. 320

7 - 13 December 2000

Enough is enough

No. This has absolutely nothing to do with the General Workers’ Union campaign against the budget measures. However, this phrase is certainly relevant to what is happening in the local Internet sector.
Over the past week, we have seen the ISPs action committee and Video On Line at loggerheads after the former signed an interconnection agreement to set up an ATM local backbone that does not include VOL. On the one hand, Video On Line and MITTS have been experiencing numerous access problems and their users have found it nearly impossible to receive email. In reply, the ISPs action committee have hit out at allegations made that some of the members on the committee were restricting access and preventing email from being delivered. They have denied such allegations saying that the problems being experienced by VOL and MITTS users are due to the fact that VOL are not on the backbone. Without going into the merits of who is right or wrong – this is not the media’s role – one cannot continue to remain passive in front of a situation that could have serious implications on the industry.
While VOL and the ISPs continue to argue, the fact remains that the users are still suffering. In a report carried in Wednesday’s The Malta Independent, David Thake said that it was not true that all Internet users were being affected. We beg to differ. Whatever the reasons for the present impasse, there is no doubt that users with all ISPs are having problems.
Since VOL and MITTS users could not receive email since Monday afternoon, this means that many subscribers with the other ISPs could not send email to colleagues or clients who are hosted at VOL. To give an example, if a company A is hosted at Waldonet or Terranet and wants to send an email to 50 clients hosted at VOL, the chances are this email will either not arrive or else turn up 24 hours later. This is not acceptable.
We are living in an age where electronic access and email have become essential items. Irrespective of which party is to blame, a service that many have come to expect to be as efficient as any other essential service, is not being given.
What are the competent authorities doing?
When the ISPs announced the interconnection agreement at a press conference, The Malta Business Weekly had carried a story saying that the Telecommunications Regulator was studying the legality of such an agreement. Last Thursday, a complaint was filed with the Regulator after VOL started having problems. A week later, the Regulator has not come out with a statement, at least to say that the dispute is being tackled with immediacy and a decision will be taken shortly.
As things are, it seems that the Office of the Regulator is simply waiting for something else to happen. It could be that he is waiting until the Telecommunications Authority is set up on 1 January and Joe Tabone will take over as Regulator. Yet what is going to happen in the next two weeks? Will users continue to suffer? Will both parties continue arguing, hoping that a decision will be taken in their favour?
This newspaper has repeatedly called on the Office of the Regulator to take a more active and immediate stand when such disputes arise. We do not expect him to reach a decision in a day or two, however he should have called an urgent meeting with the parties concerned and gathered as much information as possible. Sending letters and waiting for a reply does not help much.

Malta does nicely in Nice

There was good news at the weekend for Malta following the conclusion of the Nice European Union summit.
After hours of talks, the EU member States finally agreed on a new treaty, concluded the Intergovernmental Conference, and given the go-ahead for enlargement of the Union. It is also good news that EU leaders were quite positive that some of the EU applicant countries could make it into the Union before the European elections which will be held in June 2004.
This means that Malta – already considered a leader of the pack of applicant countries – could find itself among those joining between 2003 and 2004, subject to successful negotiations on accession. The much-awaited summit also concluded that each country could have its own European Commissioner. Of greater importance is that agreement was reached over the re-weighting of votes of each member State. Malta was given three votes in the council of Ministers.
With regards to the number of MEPs that the candidate countries would be entitled to upon accession, Malta was given five compared to six for Luxembourg, Cyprus and Estonia.
All in all, not a bad deal for Malta and this augurs well for the country’s future in the EU on joining.

  © Standard Publications Limited 1999

 

1999