Issue No. 347

14 - 20 June 2001

Decision to increase allowances taken by the Prime Minister

by Ivan Brincat

The decision to increase the expense allowance for public officers serving in Scales 1 to 4 was approved by the Prime Minister and was not submitted for Cabinet approval.
In a reply to questions sent by The Malta Business Weekly, the Office of the Prime Minister said that decisions of this nature, “that is decisions concerning minor adjustments to allowances, are approved by the Prime Minister and are not normally submitted for Cabinet approval”.
This answer was given in reply to questions regarding who had taken political responsibility for this decision and whether it was true that some ministers in Cabinet were against the decision.
The OPM in its reply confirmed that in fact the decision was approved by the Prime Minister and was not submitted for Cabinet approval.
The decision to increase the expense allowances by 50 per cent in some cases has irked constituted bodies such as the Federation of Industry.
In fact, employees in scale 1 had their allowances increased from Lm1,000 to Lm1,500, those in scale 2 from Lm800 to Lm1,200, those of scale 3 from Lm600 to Lm900 and those on scale 4 will get an increase of Lm250 from Lm450 to Lm700.
This increase came just at a time when the legal notice on fringe benefits came into force affecting hundreds of employees and also companies. Last week, The Malta Business
Weekly reported that companies had been faced with requests for increases in salaries to compensate for the loss in income due to the tax.
In a statement last week, the FOI said the fact that such a move came so close to the battles with unions over pay increases was “nothing more than a subtle way by the government to compensate its top
public officials for the additional taxation which has eroded their remuneration package after the budget taxed their fringe benefits”.
The FOI criticised the fact that many public service officials have received salary increases in addition to expense account adjustments. It said: “In the coming months, the trade unions will be negotiating with government for further increases in wages and salaries that will apply to the whole public sector in the coming three years. The country cannot afford any extravagances at the present moment.”
However, the OPM said that this expense allowance was introduced in 1991 to partially redress the inadequate compensation package of the top management of the public service. This allowance has remained unchanged over the past 10 years.

“As a result, the value of this allowance has eroded considerably over the years,” the OPM said.
The OPM said it was therefore felt opportune to revise the allowance and re-establish the relation between this allowance and the salary pertaining to each scale.
Asked whether the government now expected companies to follow suit and increase allowances to compensate for the loss in revenue due to the legal notice on fringe benefits, the OPM said that the government did not compensate its employees to make good for the tax on fringe benefits.
“As a matter of fact, this allowance and other fringe benefits forming part of the compensation package of public officers are subject to 35 per cent tax.”
Sources close to the Cabinet told The Malta Business Weekly that the decision to increase the expense allowances exactly at the same time when the legal notice on fringe benefits came into force was not only a case of bad timing but also a rather contradictory move at a time when the government was trying to curb increase in public expenditure.
Last week, Edwin Calleja, secretary general of the FOI told this newspaper that it seemed as if only the government could afford such luxuries.

  © Standard Publications Limited 1999